WhatsApp before Supreme Court: Who is Sahil Baghla
WhatsApp before Supreme Court: Who is Sahil Baghla, a bitcoin scam accused? The curious case of Good Governance Chambers and Law Juno - Bar & Bench - Indian Legal News
In its reply, WhatsApp has urged that the Court inquire into the credentials of the think tank, "Good Governance Chambers" and its motivation in filing the PIL against WhatsApp Pay, a pilot mobile payments project by FB.
In a reply filed this week through WhatsApp's Director & Associate General Counsel, Brian Hennessy, it is asserted that the digital payment feature of WhatsApp pay has been subjected to intense regulatory scrutiny and oversight by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and the National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI). It is also noted that the payment feature has been under review by the Supreme court since July 2018 in the case of Centre for Accountability an Systemic Change v. UOI. It adds that over a two year period, WhatsApp has worked diligently to meet the conditions to launch the full release version of WhatsApp Pay. As such, it contended that there is no occasion for any "busybody" to intervene at this stage to superimpose their views in this process. Inquire first into motivation of Good Governance Chambers, urges WhatsApp Concerns have been raised over the credentials and motivations of one of the petitioners in the pending PIL, i.e. Good Governance Chambers (GGC). WhatsApp's reply states that the think tank has given vague objectives for its functioning, with little to no information on the public domain to substantiate these claims. The think tank appears to have been formed only recently, states the reply, as guaged from the recent registration of its website. The reply goes on to refer to certain links found between GGC, the Law Firm Law Juno representing them, a complaint before the Competition Commission of India (CCI) against WhatsApp Pay and a man reported to have been implicated in $300 million worth Bitcoin-based Ponzi scheme, Sahil Baghla. In this regard, the reply details the following. On the apparent link between the GGC and their lawyers, Law Juno
- The Good Governance Chambers website was registered on the same date that the petitioners law firm, Law Juno was registered.
- Both websites were registered barely a month before filing the PIL.
- The Petitioners Twitter page was created in February 2020, with its first tweet dated February 13, 2020, two weeks before filing the petition.
- The Petitioners Facebook page was created on March 29, 2020, one month after filing the Petition.
- A complaint was filed to stop WhatsApp pay by one, Mrs. Harshita Chawla on March 19, 2020, shortly after the Petition was filed.
- The CCI complaint is also directed against WhatsApp and Facebook Inc. and seeks the same core relief (stopping the launch of WhatsApp Pay) based on the same core facts.
- The address provided in this complaint is identical to that of the petitioner.
- Both the CCI complaint and the Supreme Court Petition were drawn by the same advocate, Suneha Jain.
- The petition and the CCI complaint indicates that the advocate is a member of the Law firm, Law Juno.
- According to Law Junos website, the firm shared the same address with the Petitioner and the CCI complainant up until at least May 18, 2020. The website was only recently amended to reflect a new address for Law Juno.
- One, Sahil Baghla was recently incarcerated in connection with allegations of serious criminal activity, i.e. being involved in a 300 million worth Bitcoin-based Ponzi scheme.
- The Petitioners domain name (www.g2chambers.org) was registered using the alias Half Monk with a phone traceable (according to a Truecaller search) to an individual named Mr Sahila Baghla.
- The domain name of the Petitioners law firm (www.lawjuno.com) was registered with the alias Half Monk and with the same phone number that registered Petitioners domain name i.e., it is traceable to an individual named Sahil Baghla.
- On LinkedIn, an individual named Sahil Baghla identifies Law Juno as his employer, and is listed as the job poster for a legal researcher position with Petitioner.
- According to Law Junos website, the firm until recently shared the same address with the Petitioner.
- Facebook page of an individual named Sahil Baghla contains posts that appear to promote the Petitioner.
Other News India
FC Goa, ATK-Mohun Bagan and Bengaluru FC to get India's three 2021 continental spots - Goal India
David de Gea is "an unbelievable goalkeeper", according to Tomasz Kuszczak, who says the Manchester United number one was like "Spider-Man" in training
Communal colour added to pregnant elephant’s death in Kerala - Deccan Chronicle
Maneka Gandhi’s tweet triggers controversy
Kochi: The gruesome death of an elephant in Kerala after she was allegedly given a pineapple stuffed with firecrackers has polarised debate on social media platforms along communal lines. The pregnant cow had strayed from the Silent Valley forest and the incident took place in Malappuram, a Muslim majority district in Kerala. She was spotted standing still in water and Forest Department staff tried to save her using kumki elephants, but she didn't budge. As national and international media picked up the incident, right-wing supporters tried to portray it as cruelty by people in Muslim-dominated Malappuram. A few national media channels reported that local people offered the elephant an explosives-stuffed pineapple but it is not clear how exactly the incident happened. Animal rights activist and BJP leader Maneka Gandhi responded to the incident on Twitter: “Mallapuram is known for its intense criminal activity especially with regard to animals. No action has ever been taken against a single poacher or wildlife killer so they keep doing it. I can only suggest that you call/email and ask for action." She added: “The government and wildlife department in Kerala take no action. About 600 elephants are killed by temples by breaking their legs, beating and starving them and otherwise by private owners insuring them and then deliberately drowning them or giving them gangrene by putting rusted nails on them.” To ANI, Maneka was even more direct. “It is a murder. Malappuram is famous for such incidents. It is India's most violent district. For instance, they throw poison on the roads so that 300-400 birds and dogs die at one time.” The former union minister also questioned Rahul Gandhi and demanded the removal of the forest secretary and the state minister. “Forest secretary should be removed, the minister (for wildlife protection), if he has any sense, should resign. Rahul Gandhi is from that area, why has he not taken action," she asked. Even noted personalities like Tarek Fatah, author and Pakistani-Canadian journalist, an active Twitter user, highlighted the Malappuram angle which only helped to shift focus of the incident, according to animal right activists. “The atrocity of feeding a pregnant elephant with a pineapple full of firecrackers & killing her, took place in Mallapuram district of India’s Kerala State. The district is the only Muslim-majority district of the state with an over 70% Muslim population,” tweeted Tarek Fatah. He even attached portion of an earlier news article to substantiate that Muslims constitute 70.24 per cent of the population of Malappuram. Twitterati objected to giving a religious colour to the incident. Malayalam actor Parvathy Thiruvothu expressed strong objection through her Twitter handle. “Just how you jump at an opportunity to make this an anti-Muslim, hate campaign is astonishing. Focus on the problem. ANIMALS ARE IN DANGER BECAUSE OF CRUEL EXPLOSIVE SNARES. Talk about the actual issue here!” she tweeted. “I am repeating again and again, My lady, This incident took place at Palakkad. Only reason She is Bringing this News Abt. Malappuram is And exaggerating Abt the same is as it has Large Share of Muslim population..and it's such a shame. Political parties making use of such an incident,” tweeted another user in response to Maneka Gandhi’s comment. However, animal right activist groups are upset over the politicisation of the incident. “The focus should be on addressing the issue of human-animal conflicts on a long-term basis. The policy makers and other stakeholders need to be mindful of the problem and pay attention on it to find some solution. It is unfortunate that the focus of the incident is being diverted,” said Sumanth Bindumadhav, Wildlife Campaign manager, Humane Society International International/India. Chief minister Pinarayi Vijayan and forest minister P Raju have said that strict action would be taken against those involved in the incident. ...